Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 5:23:02 GMT
Archive image. Manel García Biel The statement of “Just Ecological Transition is the paradigm of a change necessary to avoid climate collapse. It defines an essential need in the current situation of climate change, it is a matter of survival. The adjective "fair" determines that it wants to be carried out with the minimum possible social costs, as the government repeatedly repeats: " without leaving anyone behind ." We are faced with a necessary, fair and laudable approach, but it must be said that putting it into practice will not be free of problems, tensions and social conflicts. That will be an added reality to the extreme political confrontation that the right is carrying out in Spain. Transition involves profound changes and this Ecological Transition involves a profound change at many levels and aspects of the current way of producing and living. It is not a simple change and therefore it will cause many people.
That is why saying that we want to do it in a “Fair” way, when this specification is used, is because it is realistically assumed that there will be victims, many Australia Phone Number people from various sectors who will be afraid in principle of being negatively affected. by the changes, and this will undoubtedly entail conflicts derived from the subjective impact of the changes. The Just Ecological Transition will involve a change as substantial as irreversibly prioritizing the use of clean energy instead of polluting fuels. This affects energy systems but also represents a change in many sectors such as transport or agriculture only in the field of mobility. We all still remember the conflicts derived from industrial reconversion or the closure of mines, situations derived from a change incomparably smaller than the current one. There is no doubt that there are now European funds that must be able to serve to make these changes happen in a more fair way, with compensation to the most affected sectors, and with training, relocation, subsidy or, where appropriate.
Thus, the changes towards clean energies will have strong repercussions in many sectors and will directly affect many productive sectors and the lives of many people. A necessary change that must be made very carefully to avoid negative effects that cause conflicts. We have already seen how positive changes have had negative responses. The free nature of highways and the debate on a possible maintenance fee for users of highways and highways has led to a debate between those in favor of users paying it and those who want all taxpayers to pay it. . There are also controversies over the implementation of wind farms or photovoltaic plants, which due to a lack of clear definition has led to opposition from landscape defenders, with more or less reason, or opposition from agricultural populations who are harmed. And every change, no matter how positive, involves contradictions and the need to establish priorities, and because there are many people who theoretically defend a more ecological energy change but “ not in front of their house.
That is why saying that we want to do it in a “Fair” way, when this specification is used, is because it is realistically assumed that there will be victims, many Australia Phone Number people from various sectors who will be afraid in principle of being negatively affected. by the changes, and this will undoubtedly entail conflicts derived from the subjective impact of the changes. The Just Ecological Transition will involve a change as substantial as irreversibly prioritizing the use of clean energy instead of polluting fuels. This affects energy systems but also represents a change in many sectors such as transport or agriculture only in the field of mobility. We all still remember the conflicts derived from industrial reconversion or the closure of mines, situations derived from a change incomparably smaller than the current one. There is no doubt that there are now European funds that must be able to serve to make these changes happen in a more fair way, with compensation to the most affected sectors, and with training, relocation, subsidy or, where appropriate.
Thus, the changes towards clean energies will have strong repercussions in many sectors and will directly affect many productive sectors and the lives of many people. A necessary change that must be made very carefully to avoid negative effects that cause conflicts. We have already seen how positive changes have had negative responses. The free nature of highways and the debate on a possible maintenance fee for users of highways and highways has led to a debate between those in favor of users paying it and those who want all taxpayers to pay it. . There are also controversies over the implementation of wind farms or photovoltaic plants, which due to a lack of clear definition has led to opposition from landscape defenders, with more or less reason, or opposition from agricultural populations who are harmed. And every change, no matter how positive, involves contradictions and the need to establish priorities, and because there are many people who theoretically defend a more ecological energy change but “ not in front of their house.
